Preprint / Version 0

Pan-STARRS follow-up of the gravitational-wave event S250818k and the lightcurve of SN 2025ulz

Authors

  • J. H. Gillanders
  • M. E. Huber
  • M. Nicholl
  • S. J. Smartt
  • K. W. Smith
  • K. C. Chambers
  • D. R. Young
  • J. W. Tweddle
  • S. Srivastav
  • M. D. Fulton
  • F. Stoppa
  • G. S. H. Paek
  • A. Aamer
  • M. R. Alarcon
  • A. Andersson
  • A. Aryan
  • K. Auchettl
  • T. -W. Chen
  • T. de Boer
  • A. K. H. Kong
  • J. Licandro
  • T. Lowe
  • D. Magill
  • E. A. Magnier
  • P. Minguez
  • T. Moore
  • G. Pignata
  • A. Rest
  • M. Serra-Ricart
  • B. J. Shappee
  • I. A. Smith
  • M. A. Tucker
  • R. Wainscoat

Abstract

Kilonovae are the scientifically rich, but observationally elusive, optical transient phenomena associated with compact binary mergers. Only a handful of events have been discovered to date, all through multi-wavelength (gamma ray) and multi-messenger (gravitational wave) signals. Given their scarcity, it is important to maximise the discovery possibility of new kilonova events. To this end, we present our follow-up observations of the gravitational-wave signal, S250818k, a plausible binary neutron star merger at a distance of $237 \pm 62$ Mpc. Pan-STARRS tiled 286 and 318 square degrees (32% and 34% of the 90% sky localisation region) within 3 and 7 days of the GW signal, respectively. ATLAS covered 65% of the skymap within 3 days, but with lower sensitivity. These observations uncovered 47 new transients; however, none were deemed to be linked to S250818k. We undertook an expansive follow-up campaign of AT 2025ulz, the purported counterpart to S250818k. The griz-band lightcurve, combined with our redshift measurement ($z = 0.0849 \pm 0.0003$) all indicate that SN 2025ulz is a SN IIb, and thus not the counterpart to S250818k. We rule out the presence of a AT 2017gfo-like kilonova within $\approx 27$% of the distance posterior sampled by our Pan-STARRS pointings ($\approx 9.1$% across the total 90% three-dimensional sky localisation). We demonstrate that early observations are optimal for probing the distance posterior of the three-dimensional gravitational-wave skymap, and that SN 2025ulz was a plausible kilonova candidate for $\lesssim 5$ days, before ultimately being ruled out.

References

Downloads

Posted

2025-11-18